User Tools

Site Tools


sessions:2023sessions:2023session1

Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

Link to this comparison view

Both sides previous revisionPrevious revision
Next revision
Previous revision
sessions:2023sessions:2023session1 [2023/03/17 22:02] – [Confirmed participants] ross.kangsessions:2023sessions:2023session1 [2023/09/13 08:09] (current) – [Talks (all times Central European Summer Time)] ross.kang
Line 20: Line 20:
 We may need to restrict based on ensuring balance in experience and diversity in the groups. We may need to restrict based on ensuring balance in experience and diversity in the groups.
  
-[[https://forms.gle/EkshbnGH8bmT5XfY6|Application for full participation]]+[[https://forms.gle/EkshbnGH8bmT5XfY6|Application for full participation]] (closed)
  
-Deadline for application: 17 March 2023+Deadline for application: 17 March 2023 (closed)
  
 The zoom link for talks will be published here by the start of the workshop. The zoom link for talks will be published here by the start of the workshop.
Line 37: Line 37:
   * Hoang La   * Hoang La
   * Alex Scott*   * Alex Scott*
-  * Jędrzej Hodor  
   * Dan Cranston   * Dan Cranston
   * Amadeus Reinald   * Amadeus Reinald
Line 69: Line 68:
   * Paloma T. Lima   * Paloma T. Lima
   * Tomas Kaiser   * Tomas Kaiser
 +  * Sepehr Hajebi 
 +  * Hidde Koerts 
 +  * Aristotelis Chaniotis 
 +  * Paul Seymour
  
 * indicates speaker * indicates speaker
Line 81: Line 83:
 Template: {{ sessions:2022sessions:opl-example.tgz| download}} Template: {{ sessions:2022sessions:opl-example.tgz| download}}
  
-Deadline: 20 March 2023+Deadline: 21 March 2023 (closed)
  
 ==== Schedule (all times Central European Summer Time) ==== ==== Schedule (all times Central European Summer Time) ====
  
 We prioritise European participation, but to allow more possibilities for participation from different timezones as well as to keep the workshop lightweight, we limit most plenary activities to between 14:00 and 17:00. We prioritise European participation, but to allow more possibilities for participation from different timezones as well as to keep the workshop lightweight, we limit most plenary activities to between 14:00 and 17:00.
- 
-The following schedule is tentative: 
  
 1. //Monday, 27 March// 1. //Monday, 27 March//
-  * 13:55 welcome+  * 14:05 welcome 
 +  * 14:15 open problem session 
 +  * 15:45 group formation 
 +2. //Tuesday 28 March//
   * 14:05 talk   * 14:05 talk
   * 15:05 break   * 15:05 break
-  * 15:15 open problem session 
-  * 16:45 group formation 
-2. //Tuesday 28 March// 
   * 15:15 group updates   * 15:15 group updates
 3. //Wednesday 29 March// 3. //Wednesday 29 March//
Line 103: Line 103:
   * 15:15 group updates   * 15:15 group updates
 5. //Friday, 31 March// 5. //Friday, 31 March//
-  * 14:05 talk 
-  * 15:05 break 
   * 15:15 final updates   * 15:15 final updates
   * 16:30 close of meeting    * 16:30 close of meeting 
  
-To preserve the interactive nature of the meetingno talks are to be recorded and we encourage attendees to keep their cameras on.+==== Talks (all times Central European Summer Time) ==== 
 + 
 +=== Sophie Spirkl: χ-boundedness and η-boundedness === 
 + 
 +I will talk about η(G), the minimum size of a set of vertices X in G such that α(G\X) < α(G). This parameter has some surprising parallels with χ(G)and in particular, one can ask about “η-boundedness,” defined analogously to χ-boundedness. I will present some results and open questions about this. 
 + 
 +This is based on joint work with Sepehr Hajebi and Yanjia Li. 
 + 
 +14:05, 28 March, https://uva-live.zoom.us/j/81672886664 
 + 
 +=== Alex Scott: On a problem of El-Zahar and Erdős === 
 + 
 +Two subgraphs A, B of a graph G are anticomplete if they are vertex-disjoint and there are no edges joining them. Is it true that if G is a graph with bounded clique number, and sufficiently large chromatic number, then it has two anticomplete subgraphs, both with large chromatic number? This is a question raised by El-Zahar and Erdős in 1986, and remains open. If so, then at least there should be two anticomplete subgraphs both with large minimum degree, and that is one of our results. 
 + 
 +We prove two variants of this. First, a strengthening: we can ask for one of the two subgraphs to have large chromatic number. Second, we look at what happens if we replace the hypothesis that G has large chromatic number with the hypothesis that G has sufficiently large minimum degree. This, together with excluding K_t, is not enough to guarantee two anticomplete subgraphs both with large minimum degree; but it works if instead of excluding a complete graph we exclude a complete bipartite graph. Finally, we discuss analogous problems for tournaments. 
 + 
 +This is joint work with Tung Nguyen and Paul Seymour. 
 + 
 +16:15, 29 March, https://us06web.zoom.us/j/88229832543?pwd=bmJidUVEcDJwaGZnTVJQNnFGTGdZQT09 (co-hosted by Jagiellonian TCS seminar)
  
 +==== Research results ====
  
 +  * Duraj, Kang, La, Narboni, Pokrývka, Rambaud, Reinald. The χ-binding function for d-directional segment graphs. https://arxiv.org/abs/2309.06072
sessions/2023sessions/2023session1.1679090546.txt.gz · Last modified: 2023/03/17 22:02 by ross.kang